NORTH YORKSHIRE Police and Jimmy #Savile: Freedom of Information Request Refused

15 05 10 FOI North Yorkshire PoliceWhatDoTheyKnow is a well underused resource in my view.

This FOI request contains interesting evidence of Jimmy Savile’s activities and the Police not being willing to admit, apologise and compensate.

No wonder, we are Desperately Seeking: Police against Child Abuse with

  • an invitation to everybody to take a Crime Report to their local Police station
  • a petition for Constables to sign.
  • and this one-page Executive Summary – also here as pdf:

Executive Summary of Crime Report re Reported Paedophile Cult

This Crime Report is directed at British Constabularies, after Barnet (North London) Police and the Metropolitan Police failed to comply with EU Directive 2011/92[1] on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography.

In the spirit of the Directive, the British Public and Internet Community have become the ‘legally competent authority’, since the UK authorities have failed two child victims and witnesses who reported their own and the abuse of 18 other ‘special’ children. In the light of the cover-ups of historic abuse, we are urgently seeking ‘Police against Child Abuse’.

The Report uses the ‘Hampstead Scandal’ that had become ‘internet famous’ before Mrs Justice Pauffley’s judgment was published with the headline: Satanic ‘cult’ dismissed by judge. It has come to be the public’s widespread opinion that Mrs Justice Pauffley has become a professionally negligent and/or criminally complicit Suspect for the following reasons:

  1. According to a former Detective Constable of the Metropolitan Police who analysed the Crime Reporting Information System (CRIS) Report, Barnet Police closed the case without “planning, preparation and the consideration of investigative strategies, actions or reviews.”
  2. Barnet Police made use of the Harassment Act to incriminate the mother, her partner and her McKenzie Friend (lay legal advisor) so that they fled UK jurisdiction. But none of the alleged 70+ abusers have been investigated, even though the children had described detailed distinguishing marks of their private parts that are easily verifiable.
  3. Instead, the ethos of secrecy of UK Family Courts was used by Barnet Council and subsequently by the High Court of the Family Division to conceal and cover-up serious crimes and to disadvantage the mother and favour the allegedly abusive father.
  4. The legal team of the Metropolitan Police colluded in the failure to investigate to Professional Standards by submitting their unacceptable ‘Grounds of Resistance’ in response to the mother’s Judicial Review to re-open the case.
  5. High Court Judge Pauffley did not make any effort to dissolve all grounds for suspicion and concern for the safety of all the children involved.
  6. Neither did she affirm appropriate grounds for the guilt of the supposed abuser, namely Mr Abraham Christie, or proof of innocence of any of the alleged 70+ abusers, who were named by the children, independently of each other, and with persuasive consistency across different adults who interviewed them.
  7. Instead, the father, accused of being the leader of a cult involving eight schools and a church, was given more contact than the mother and pronounced innocent while none of his computers were seized or investigated. Thanks to the outrage of the British and internet public, evidence has been provided that the father may be a child pornographer: Video 17 of Hampstead Research[2], dedicated to finding facts to substantiate the children’s allegations.

[1] http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32011L0093

[2] https://hampsteadresearch.wordpress.com/vid-17-dearman-child-pornographer/

Advertisements

About Sabine Kurjo McNeill

I'm a mathematician, software designer, system analyst, event organiser, independent web publisher and online promoter of positivity.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to NORTH YORKSHIRE Police and Jimmy #Savile: Freedom of Information Request Refused

  1. l8in says:

    Reblogged this on L8in.

    Like

  2. Pingback: DESPERATELY SEEKING: ‘Police Against Child Abuse’ to Investigate ‘Hampstead Case’ aka #WhistleblowerKids | 'Whistleblower Kids' in the Court of Public Interest

  3. Pingback: Dear Police, Please support Investigations into Crimes alleged by #WhistleblowerKids | Voluntary Public Interest Advocacy

  4. Pingback: Related Family and Criminal Proceedings: Nice Words, Harsh Realities #whistleblowerkids #forcedadoption | 'Whistleblower Kids' in the Court of Public Interest

  5. Pingback: Lord Dyson’s Dinner Speech about Hot Potatoes: #McKenzieFriends and Litigants in Person #LiPs #Help4LiPs | Victims Unite!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s