PETITION in Scottish Parliament as ours apparently can not be restored…

An exemplary model for individual action:

Here’s the video:

His last article was about whistleblower Melanie Shaw:

Scott writes:

Spoke in parliament with the aim to convince MSPs that mandatory reporting should be the way forward in order to get justice to the vulnerable and victims of opportunistic, predators who exploit children. My speech was hard hitting and said some controversial truths. With satanic ritual occults heavily involved that have had cases that involve rape, torture and murder.

The whole experience was electrifying, will power and determination carried me through. By the end of the experience I could honestly say that I was exhausted.

I could have done more but what I did do was awaken the powers that be to what we are dealing with here. That alone combined with the satisfaction of being congratulated and my petition being approved told me that there is still hope of victims and the most vulnerable getting justice.

In addition, these online petitions are still open for you to sign:

And the history of deleting my two petitions on www.change.org is:

Notice Regarding Your Change.org Petitions

Mar 16, 3:15 PM

Hi there,

We’re writing to follow up our previous email sent on March 4, 2015. In that email, we informed you that we had received several complaints notifying us that your petition, and the associated sites linked to therein, were in violation of a court order. Following that email, we removed all links associated with your petition.

We also informed you that if you added or re-inserted links in the petition that violate the privacy of those involved in this court case, we might be forced to remove the entire petition.

It has come to our attention that you have continued to add links to your original petition and have started a second petition with similar content. To bring your petitions into line with our legal terms, you’ll need to remove all links in your petition content, including updates, on both of your petitions. We ask that you complete this within 24 hours or we will be forced to remove both petitions.

Regards,
Change.org
(From US Office/Help desk)

So sorry. I never saw that email on March 4. Instead I had asked the Help Centre for an explanation of the links being removed!

Can you please resend?

And can you please let me re-open the petition with links removed?

Please note that the court proceedings take place in SECRECY:

1. without the mother whose children were taken, as she fled the jurisdiction following the visit of 9 constables without an arrest warrant, without the children being heard who are very articulate and intelligent, as videos demonstrate

2. without a legal representative on her behalf due to her communication difficulties in exile

3. without the media or the general public.

We have campaigned against the secrecy of UK family courts not only in the UK Parliament but also in the EU. For it is used to cover up the snatching of a child every 20 minutes, as Channel IV is publishing.

Looking forward to ‘remedial action’,

yours gratefully in advance.

Sabine

Hello,

We’re sorry to hear that you didn’t see our original email to you. Below is a copy of that email:

Hi there,

We’re writing to let you know that we have received several complaints notifying us that your petition, and the associated sites linked to therein, are in violation of a court order.

We understand this is a complex and delicate situation. Change.org is an open platform and we care deeply about free speech and empowering our users to effect the change they want to see. As such, we have not removed the petition itself.

However, we found several privacy violations in the pages linked to from the petition page, and in order to comply with the terms of the court order we have removed all links from the petition. If you add or re-insert links in the petition that violate the privacy of those involved in this court case, we may be forced to remove the entire petition.

Thank you for using Change.org, and do let us know if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Change.org
(From US Office/Help desk)

Unfortunately as both petitions have been completely removed from our platform, they can not be restored.

We thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

Regards,
Change.org
(From US Office/Help desk)

    March 18, 2015, 9:20 AM

    WOW. What a waste of everybody’s time – all due to your inefficiency:

    WHERE is the original of your email, please?

    Which email address did you send it to?

    Who are the ‘several complaints’ from? Why did they not contact me?

    Why did Debbie at your Help Centre not refer to your email of 4 March when I asked her about the missing links on 10 March???

    Obviously I would have complied with your requests, if I had KNOWN about them!

    How can you throw everybody’s campaigning efforts out of the window just like that???

    I am shocked, more than dissatisfied and appalled.

    I am sure that every smart programmer can restore what has been deleted. The signatures are stored separately. Please send them at least out of decency, courtesy and as a gesture of apology:

    1. https://www.change.org/p/the-rt-hon-theresa-may-mp-return-whistleblowerkids-and-abusesurvivors-to-their-russian-family

    2. https://www.change.org/p/the-internet-community-of-good-people-join-private-prosecutions-and-civil-claims-on-behalf-of-the-whistleblowerkids

    I was convinced that you would restore the sites if I was to carefully eliminate all links. I just can’t believe that it’s “all gone.”

    Sabine

      March 18, 2015, 10:04 AM
      • PS. I would like you to appreciate that the SECRECY of UK Family Courts is used to cover up criminal activities. I listed the charges on the second petition:1. Sexual activity with a child family member
        2. Rape of a child under the age of 13
        3. Assault of a child under 13 by penetration
        4. Sexual assault of a child under 13
        5. Causing or inciting a child under 13 to engage in sexual activity
        6. Sexual activity with a child
        7. Causing or inciting a child to engage in sexual activity
        8. Engaging in sexual activity in the presence of a child
        9. Causing a child to watch a sexual act
        10. Arranging or facilitating commission of a child sex offence
        11. MURDER
        12. Perverting the course of justice common law
        13. Blackmail
        14. Witness Intimidation
        15. Cannibalism
        16. Exploitation of child sex for financial gainAnd I submitted an emergency petition to the EU Parliament in Brussels: http://mckenzie-friends.co.uk/2015/03/07/using-the-secrecy-of-ukfamilycourts-to-cover-up-criminal-activities/

      March 18, 2015, 2:04 PM

      PPS:

      Dear Mr Mowrey

      For you to have deleted two of my petitions, supposedly irretrievably, is a really serious violation of professional standards by an internet platform:

      1. I just happened to have discovered your ‘Notice’ of 4 March, i.e. NOT an email as you claimed you sent!

      2. Before removing petitions, your IT department MUST ensure that the petitioner has been ‘served’, i.e. has DEFINITELY received your ‘warning’!

      3. To allow for mistakes, such as you with your Notice (rather than email with receipt confirmed) and your colleague Debbie not knowing about it, you MUST be able to RESTORE petitions!

      If I didn’t have bigger fish to fry, I would certainly take you and Change.org to court.

      This way, I trust that you’ll LEARN, as most people only seem to be able to learn from PAINFUL experiences, i.e. mistakes.

      Yours with all possible customer dissatisfaction,

      Sabine
      www.sabinemcneill.co.uk

      Advertisements

      About Sabine Kurjo McNeill

      I'm a mathematician and system analyst formerly at CERN in Geneva and became an event organiser, software designer, independent web publisher and online promoter of Open Justice. My most significant scientific contribution is www.smartknowledge.space
      This entry was posted in Abuse Survivors, Barnet Council, Camden Council, Hampstead Scandal, Internet Media, Melanie Shaw, Parliament, Russian Whistleblower Kids, Scotland, UK Establishment and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

      4 Responses to PETITION in Scottish Parliament as ours apparently can not be restored…

      1. Pingback: #SatanicCult? Dismissed. You must be joking! #DamePauffley knows! | 'Whistleblower Kids' in the Court of Public Interest

      2. Pingback: #WhistleBlowerKids What next? #Pauffley #Council #Police #Hampstead? | 'Whistleblower Kids' in the Court of Public Interest

      3. Pingback: REPORTING #Pauffley to JCIO, #Dearman to his manager and Change.org to their CEO | 'Whistleblower Kids' in the Court of Public Interest

      Leave a Reply

      Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

      WordPress.com Logo

      You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

      Twitter picture

      You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

      Facebook photo

      You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

      Google+ photo

      You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

      Connecting to %s